Amazon’s Editors Need Glasses

Now, I’m no Alvin Lustig or Paul Rand, but does anyone at Amazon REALLY think these are the “10 Best Covers of 2008” in all of the tens of thousands of books that were printed this year? Really?

I mean, there were some GORGEOUS covers done this year. Maybe Amazon’s editors just let some random number generator pick these. Even with the Chip Kidd cover included, this list is just weird, at best. Feel free to disagree and if you do, please explain why. I just don’t get it.

Leave a Reply

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
This site now supports Webmentions alongside the standard Comments section above. To reply using Webmentions: create a post on your own site that contains a link to this post's/page's permalink URL and then enter the URL from your site into the field above. Your response will then appear (after moderation) on this page. Long live the IndieWeb!